DRC Summary 09-06-2018OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
CITY HALL
10300 TORRE AVENUE o CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255
(408) 777-3308 ^ FAX (408) 777-3333 o planning a-cupertino.orq
To: Mayor and City Council Members
.Planning Commissioners
From: Benjamin Fu, Assistant Director of Community Development
Date: September 13; 2018
Subj: REPORT OF DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE FINAL DECISIONS MADE
September 6, 2018
Chapter 19.12.170 of the Cupertino Municipal code provides for
Appeal of decisions made by the Design Review Committee
Application
EXC-2018-02, Janice Yeh (Xtina Properties, LLC), 10280 Imperial Ave
Description
Fence Exception to allow a driveway gate on a property located in a Planned Development (Light
Industrial) Zone
Action Y
The Design,,Review Committee approved the application on a 2-0-0 vote. This is effective
September 6, 2018. The fourteen -calendar day appeal will expire on September 20, 2018.
Enclosures:
Design Review Committee Report of September 6, 2018
Resolution No(s). 330
Plan set
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE S'T'AFF REPORT
IMeeting: September 6 2018
Su— bject
Fence Exception to consider allowing a manual driveway gate on a Planned
Development (Light Industrial) property located at 10280 Imperial Avenue.
(Application No.: EXC-2018-02; Applicant: Janice Yeh; Location: 10280 Imperial
Avenue; APN: 357-19-054)
Recommended Action
That the Design Review Committee approve the Fence Exception (EXC-2018-02)
in accordance with the draft resolution (Attachment 1).
Discussion
Application Summar
The applicant, Janice Yeh of Adaptive Architecture, 'representing the property
owner Cisco Rivera, is requesting a Fence Exception to allow for the construction
of a manual driveway gate on a Planned Development (Light Industrial) property.
Project Data
Background:
Per Chapter 19.48, Fences, of the Cupertino Municipal Code (CMC), roadway and
driveway gates may be approved through a fence exception where the gate is
needed for demonstrated, security and/or demonstrated , safety reasons. CMC
Chapter 19.12; Administration, requires that the Design Review Committee review
and approve requests for exceptions to the development standards established by
the Fence Ordinance.
Analysis:
Site Description:
The subject site is located in the
Monta Vista Planning Area, south
of . Stevens Creek Boulevard and
north of McClellan Road. The
Property was incorporated into the
City of Cupertino and rezoned, to
Planned Light Industrial, P(ML), in
1984. The Planned Development
zoning designation provides for
greater flexibility of design and
land use intensity due to existing
legal non -conforming sites and/or
structures.
Surrounding land uses include
industrial and residential uses to
the north and east and residential
uses to the south and west (Figure
1). The site is immediately adjacent
to an automotive repair shop to the
north and a single-family residence
to the south. As currently designed,
the subject site does not provide a
transition or buffer between the
two distinct uses (Figure 2).
}
x i >
f
Wo
21 } 4
E
Tran .
1
Res _ox�rxe Medium
TI
Y _
�5
Figure 1. Surrounding Land Uses
Security:
The Santa Clara County Sherriff's Department confirmed that there has been a
relatively small number of burglaries and thefts within the past five (5) years along
Imperial Avenue surrounding the subject property. Since 2013, a total of five (5)
burglaries and 11 thefts have been reported. Existing businesses within the focus
area of the police report primarily consist of automotive service and repair
stations. The proposed business for the subject property is Rebel Sun Productions,
a video and audio equipment rental company, which can be a target for burglary.
Rebel Sun Productions experienced a burglary in 2015 while operating in
Mountain View. The burglary resulted in over $70,000 worth of equipment loss
and damages. Subsequently, a security gate was installed at the Mountain View
property. No other burglaries have occurred at the property since the installation
of the security gate.
Design:
The design review guidelines are regulated by the Fence Ordinance, which
outlines that fences and walls separating industrial zones from residential zones
shall be constructed to acoustically isolate part of or all noise, ensure visual
privacy for adjoining residential dwelling units, and provide for sight visibility.
The Fence Ordinance does not identify setback requirements for fences located in
zones requiring design review. Additionally, there is no established setback
pattern for existing fences or driveway gates within the Monta Vista Planning
Area.
The applicant is proposing a six (6) foot redwood driveway gate to be set back ten
(10) feet from the front property line (Figure 3). The front driveway gate will
connect to the existing six (6) foot chain-link fence for the adjacent automotive
repair shop and to the existing six (6) foot concrete masonry unit (CMU) wall along
the property line shared with the single-family residence. Staff recommends that
the proposed driveway gate be setback a minimum of ten (10) feet to provide a
buffer between the existing industrial and residential uses. The applicant is also
proposing to install a landscape planter within the front setback area adjacent to
the single-family residence. The proposed fence setback and landscape buffer are
consistent with the General Plan Policy LU -26.4 to incorporate building transitions,
setbacks, and landscaping to provide a buffer for adjoining low -intensity
residential uses. The scope of work also includes improvements to the parking lot
layout in order to be consistent with the Cupertino Parking Ordinance.
Ell
f
Figure 2. Existing Site
Figure 3. Proposed Rendering
Other Department/Agency Review:
The. City's Building Division and the Santa Clara County Sheriff's Office rev
iewed
the project ; and indicated that the driveway gate complies with relevant and
applicable codes.
The Santa Clara .County Fire Department has reviewed the proposaL and
added
condition of, approval that an approved Knox padlock shall e for rthe
manual driveway gate.
The Public Works Department has reviewed the proposal, and added a condition
that the height of the existing CMU wall shall be reduced to three (3) feet within
the fence setback to enhance visibility.
•
Environmental Assessment:
The use permit is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality
Conversion of Small
Act (CEQA) per section 15303 (New Construction or
Structures) of the CEQA Guidelines.
Public Noticing and Outreach
The following table is a brief summary of the noticing done for this project:
Notice of Public Hearing and Intent, Site Agenda
Notice & Legal Ad
■ Site Signage (14 days prior to the hearing)
■ Posted on the City's official
■ Legal ad placed in newspaper (at least 10 notice bulletinboar(one week
days prior to the hearing)
prior to the hearing)
■ Seven (7) public hearing notices mailed Posted on b ete one weCity oek
to adjacent property owners (10 days Cupertino's we
prior to the hearing)
prior to the hearing)
No public comments have been received as of the date of production of this staff
report. •
Permit Streamlining Act
This project is subject to the Permit Streamlining Act (Government
found inothe de Perm t
ction
65920 — 65964). The City has complied with the deadline
Streamlining Act.
Project Received: May 14, 2018; Deemed Incomplete: June 13, 2018
Project Received: July 11, 2018; Deemed Complete: August 9, 2018
The City has up to 60 days from the date of deeming the project complete (until
October 9, 2018) to make a decision on the project.
Conclusion
roval of the Fence Exception as the driveway
gutta is needed
Staff recommends app
e and
for demonstrated security reasons. Furthermore,
the proposed driveway g
related site improvements will improve the design relationship
e between
we on ie
existing industrial and residential uses. Together, the fence set
the CMU wall, and the proposed landscaping will provide a buffer approval
for val of the
djoining
low -intensity residential uses. Additionally, all of the findings pp
exception, consistent with Chapter 19.48, Fences, of the Cupertino Municipal Code,
may be made as reflected in the Draft Resolution. .
Next Steps
The Design Review Committees decision on this project is final unless an appeal
is filed within 14 calendar days of the decision, on September 20, 2018. If appealed,
the City Council will be the approval authority on the appeal.
If approved, the approval will expire on September 6, 2019, at which time the
applicant may apply for a one-year extension.
Prepared by: Erika Poveda, Assistant Planner
Reviewed and Approved by: Catarina Kidd, Senior Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
1— Draft Resolution
2 — Plan Set
EXC-2018-02
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
RESOLUTION NO. 330
OF THE DESIGN 'REVIEW COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING A
FENCE EXCEPTION TO ALLOW A MANUAL DRIVEWAY GATE ON A PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) PROPERTY LOCATED AT 10280 IMPERIAL
AVENUE (APN 357-19-054).
SECTION I: PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Application No.: EXC-2018-02
Applicant: Janice Yeh, Adaptive Architecture
Property Owner: Cisco Rivera, Xtina Properties, LLC.
Location: 10280 Imperial Avenue (APN# 357-19-054)
SECTION H: FINDINGS FOR FENCE EXCEPTION:
WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino received an application for a
Fence Exception as described in Section I of this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, per Chapter 19.48, Fences, of the Cupertino Municipal Code (CMC), roadway and
driveway gates may be approved through a fence exception where the gate is needed for
demonstrated security and/or demonstrated safety reasons. CMC Chapter 19.12, Administration,
requires that the Design Review Committee review and approve requests for exceptions to the
development standards established by the Fence Ordinance; and
WHEREAS,, the necessary public notices have been given as required by the Procedural
Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Design Review Committee has held at least one
Public Meeting in regards to the application; and
WHEREAS; the project is determined to be exempt from'the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA); and
WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and
WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee finds as follows with regard to this application:
1. The literal enforcement of the provisions of this chapter will result in restriction
inconsistent with the spirit and intent of this chapter.
Resolution No. 330 EXC-2018-02 September 6, 2018
The proposed driveway gate is consistent with the intent of the chapter because the proposed
driveway gate is within a non-residential zoning district, where the gate is needed for demonstrated
security and/or demonstrated safety reasons.
The proposed business for the subject property is Rebel Sun Productions, a video and audio
equipment rental company, which can be a target for burglary. Rebel Sun Productions experienced
a burglary, in 2015 while operating in Mountain View. The burglary resulted in over $70,000
worth of equipment loss and damages. Subsequently, a security gate was installed at the Mountain
View property. No other burglaries have occurred at the property since the installation of the
security gate.
2. The granting of the exception will not result in a condition which is materially detrimental
to the public health, safety or welfare.
The proposed driveway gate adheres to the Santa Clara County Fire Department's safety
requirements and a condition of approval has been added from the Santa Clara County Fire
Department to ensure access in emergencies. A separate condition of approval has been added from
the Public Works Department requiring the existing concrete masonry unit wall to be reduced to
three (3) feet in height in order to enhance vehicular visibility. Safety conditions for pedestrian and
vehicular traffic will improve from enhanced visibility.
3. The exception to be granted is one that will require the least modification of the prescribed
regulation and the minimum variance that will accomplish the purpose.
The exception is consistent with the prescribed regulation, CMC Chapter 19.48 ("Fence
Ordinance"), because the driveway gate is needed for security andlor safety reasons to prevent
burglary. The design review guidelines are regulated by the Fence Ordinance, which outlines that
fences and walls separating industrial zones from residential zones shall be constructed
to acoustically isolate part of or all noise, ensure visual privacy for adjoining residential dwelling
units, and provide for sight visibility. The Fence Ordinance does not identify setback requirements
for fences located in zones requiring design review. Additionally, there is, no established setback
pattern for existing fences or driveway gates within the Monta Vista Planning Area.
The applicant is proposing a six (6) foot redwood driveway gate to be set back ten (10) feet from the
front property line. The front driveway gate will connect to the existing six (6) foot chain-link fence
for the adjacent automotive repair shop and to the existing six (6) foot concrete masonry unit
(CMU) wall along the property line shared with the single-family residence. These heights,
materials and fence placements are consistent with fences within the area. The proposed driveway
gate be setback a minimum of ten (10) feet to provide a buffer between the existing industrial and
residential uses. The applicant is also proposing to install a landscape planter within the front
setback area adjacent to the single-family residence. The proposed fence.setback and landscape buffer
are consistent with the General Plan Policy LU -26.4 to incorporate building transitions, setbacks,
and landscaping to provide a buffer for adjoining low -intensity residential uses, causing no
modification to the prescribed regulation and no variance.
Resolution No. 330 EXC-2018-02 September 6, 2018
4. The proposed exception will not result in a hazardous condition for pedestrian and
vehicular traffic.
The proposed driveway gate has been reviewed by the Department of Public Works, and a condition
of approval has been added requiring the existing concrete masonry unit wall to be reduced to three
(3) feet in height. Safety conditions for pedestrian and vehicular traffic will improve from enhanced
visibility.
5. The proposed development is otherwise consistent with the City's General Plan and with
the purpose of this chapter as described in Section 19.48.010,
The proposed driveway gate is otherwise consistent with the City's General Plan since the fence
provides increased security for the property. The proposed fence setback and landscape buffer are
consistent with the General Plan Policy LU -26.4 to incorporate building transitions, setbacks, and
landscaping to provide a buffer for adjoining low -intensity residential uses..
6. The proposed development meets the requirements of the Santa Clara Fire Department
and Sheriff's Department, and if security gates are proposed, that attempts are made to
standardize access.
A condition of approval has been added to ensure standardized access.
7. The fence height for the proposed residential fence is needed to ensure adequate screening
and/or privacy.
The proposed exception is not for a residential fence.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of the maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence
submitted in this matter, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution
beginning on PAGE 3 thereof:
The application for a Fence Exception Permit, Application no. EXC-2018-02 is hereby
recommended for approval and that the sub -conclusions upon which the findings and conditions
specified in this resolution are based and contained in the Public Meeting record .concerning
Application no. EXC-2018-02 as set forth in the Minutes of Design Review Committee Meeting of
September 6, 2018, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein.
SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMLVIUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
1. APPROVED EXHIBITS
Approval recommendation is based on the plan set entitled, "Rebel Sun New Fence and
Parking Lot Layout," consisting of three (3) sheets labeled, "A0.1, ALL, and Field Survey
Exhibit" except as may be amended by conditions in this resolution.
2. ACCURACY OF PROTECT PLANS
The, applicant/property owner is responsible to verify all pertinent property data including but
not limited to property boundary locations, building setbacks, property size, building square
Resolution No. 330 EXC-2018-02 September 6, 2018
footage, any relevant easements and/or construction records. Any misrepresentation of
property data may invalidate this approval and may require additional review.
3. ANNOTATION OF THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
The conditions of approval set forth shall be incorporated into and annotated on the first page
of the building plans.
4. CONSULTATION WITH OTHER DEPARTMENTS
The applicant is responsible to consult with other departments and/or agencies with regard
to the proposed project for additional conditions and requirements. Any misrepresentation
of any submitted data may invalidate an approval by the Community -Development
Department.
5. INDEMNIFICATION
Except as otherwise prohibited by law, the applicant shall indemnify and hold harmless the
City, its City Council, and its officers, employees and agents (collectively, the "indemnified
parties") from and against any claim, action, or proceeding brought by a third party against
one or more of the indemnified parties or one or more of the indemnified parties and the
applicant to attack, set aside, or void this Resolution or any permit or approval authorized
hereby for the project, including (without limitation) reimbursing the City its actual attorneys'
fees and costs incurred in defense of the litigation. The applicant shall pay such attorneys'
fees and costs within 30 days following receipt of invoices from City. Such attorneys' fees and
costs shall include amounts paid to counsel not otherwise employed as City staff and shall
include City Attorney time and overhead costs and other City staff overhead costs and any
costs directly related to the litigation reasonably incurred by City.
6. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS, OR OTHER EXACTIONS
The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication
requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code
Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount
of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are
hereby further notified that the 90 -day approval period in which you may protest these fees,
dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section
66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90 -day period complying with all
of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such
exactions.
SECTION IV: CONDITIONS ADMINSTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
7. VISIBILITY REQUIREMENTS:
The existing concrete masonry unit wall along the southern property line shall be reduced in
height to three (3) feet between the property line and the proposed fence to enhance visibility.
Resolution No. 330 EXC-2018-02 September 6, 2018
SECTION V: CONDITIONS ADMINSTERED BY THE SANTA CLARA COUNTY FIRE
DEPARTMENT
8. EMERGENCY GATE/ACCESS GATE REQUIREMENTS:
Gate installations shall conform to the Fire Department Standard Details and Specification G-
1 and, when open shall not obstruct any portion of the required width for emergency access
roadways or driveways. Gate locks, if provided, shall be fire department approved prior to
installation. Gates across the emergency access roadways shall be equipped with approved
access devices. If the gates are operated electrically,. an approved Knox key switch shall be
installed; if they are operated manually, then an approved Knox padlock shall be installed.
Gates providing access from a road to a driveway or other roadway shall be at least 30 feet
from the road being exited. CFC Sec. 503 and 506'.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of September 2018, Regular Meeting of the Design Review
Committee of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following vote:
AYES:
COMMISSIONERS: Chair Takahashi, Fung
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS: none
ABSTAIN:
COMMISSIONERS: none
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS: none
ATTEST:
/s/Erika Poveda
Erika Poveda
Assistant Planner
APPROVED:
/s/Alan Takahashi
Alan Takahashi,
Chair, Design Review Committee
REDEL 5UN
NEW FENCE AND PARKING LAYOUT
10280 IMPERIAL AVENUE
CUPERTINO, CA 95014
DRAWING 5YMB0L LEGEND
N PROJECT NORTH
2 g COLUMN REFERENCE GRIDS
8,23 = COLUMN DESIGNATION
B -
I
SAA
ELEVATION
ABBREVIATIONS
4 =ELEVATION DESIGNATION
A5.1
4
And
F.O.5.
Face of Studs SECT.
Section
PROJECT DATA
L
Angle
FT.
Foot or Feet
5h
Shelf
WALL SECTION
@
At
FTG.
Footing
SHT.
Sheet
RL
Centerline
FW
Fire Water
5HWP.
SIM.
Shower
Similar
2,680 5F BUILDING
MA..®=�
jC7:
Diameter or
GA.
Gauge
SPEC.
Specification
W
W
Round
GALV.
Galvanized
5Q.
Square
d
Penny (N2115)
G.B.
Grab Bar
55T.
Stainless
#
Pound
GI
Galvanized
Steel
(E)
Existing
Iron
STD.
Standard
(N)
New
GL.
Glass
STL.
Steel
(P)
Relocated
GND.
Ground
5TOR.
Storage
ACG
Accessible
GP.
Grade
5TRUCT.5tructural
A/C
Air
GS
Galvanized
5U5P.
Suspended
Conditioning
Steel
5YM.
Symmetrical
A.C.
Asphaltic
GYP.
Gypsum
SYS.
5y5tem
Conc.
ACOUS.
Acoustical
H.D.
Hose Bibb
T.B.
Towel Bar
A.D.
Area Drain
h,C.
Hollow Core
TEL.
Telephone
DJ.
AdJustable
HDR.
Header
TER.
Terrazzo
ALT.
Alternate
HDWD,
Hardwood
Th K.
Thick
ALUM.
Aluminum
HDWR.
Hardware
T.4 G.
Tongue 4
APPROX.Approximate
H,M.
Hollow Metal
Groove
ARCH.
Architectural
HORIZ.
Horizontal
T.O.C.
To of Curb
HT.
Height
T.O.C.D.Top of
BD.
Board
Concrete
BITUM.
Bituminous
I.D.
Inside
Deck
BLDG.
Building
Diameter
T.O.P.
Top of
BLK.
Block
IN5UL.
Insulation
Pavement/
BLKG.
Blocking
INT.
Interior
Top of
B.M.
Bench Mark
Parapet
BFP.
Backflow
JAN.
Janitor
T.O.P..D.Top of Roof
Prevent
Deck
BOT.
Bottom
KIT.
Kitchen
T.O.5.
Top of
Sheathingg
CAB.
Cabinet
LAB.
Laboratory
T.O.W.
Top of Wall
C.B.
Chalk Board
LAM.
Laminate
TRD.
Tread'
CEM.
Cement
LAV.
lavatory.
T.5.W.
Top of
CER._
Ceramic
UKP.
Locker
Sidewalk
C:I.
Gast Iron
LT.
Light
T.V.
Television
C.J.
Const. Joint
TYP.
Typical
C.L.
Chain Lirlkr
MAINT.
Maintenance
CLG.
Ceilmg
MAT.
Material
U.L.
Underwriters
CLP.
Clear
MAX.
Maximum
Laboratory
CNTR.
Counter
M.D.
Machine Bolt
U.N.O.
Unless Noted
COL.
Column .
M.D.F.
'Medium
Otherwise
GONG.
Concrete
Density
U.O.N.
Unless
CONN.Connection
fiberboard
Otherwise
CONST.
Construction
MECH.
Mechanical
Noted
CONT.
Continuous
MEMS.
-Membrane
CORP.
Corridor
MEZZ.
Mezzanine
V.C.T.
Vinyl
CPT.
Carpet
MFR.
Manufacturer
Composition
CTSK.
Countersunk
MH.
Manhole
Tile
CTR.
Center
MIN.
Minimum
VERT.
Vertical
CW.
Cold Water
MIR.
Mirror
VE5T.
Vestibule
MISC.
Miscellaneous
V.T.R.
Vent Through
DBL.
Double
M.O.
Masonry
Roof
DEPT.
Department
Opening
V.W.C.
Vinyl Wall
D.F.
Drinking
MTD.
Mounted
Covering
Fountain /
MTL.
Metal
Douglas Fir
MUL.
Mullion
W
West
DIA.
Diameter
w/
With
DAG.
Diagonal
N
North
W.C.
Water Closet
DIM:
Dimension
N.I.C.
Not In
WD.
Wood
D15P.
Dispenser
Contract
WDW.
Window
N.
Down
No. or # Number
W/O
Without
DR.
Door
NOM
Nominal
W.S.
Wood Screw
DS.
Downspout
N.T.S.
Not To Scale
WT.
Welt
D.5.P.
Dry StandPipe
W.W.F.
Welded Wire
DTL
Detail
OD
Outside
Fabric
DWG.
Drawmg
Diameter
-0WR.
Drawer
O.A.
Overall
O.C.
On Center
EA.°
Each
OFF.
Office
E.J.
Expansion
ORP.
Opposite
Joint
OPER
Operable
'
EL.
Elevation
ELEC.
Electrical
P.L.C.C.
Plastic laminate
EL6V..Elevator
Covered
EMER.
Emergency
Casework
ENCL.
Enclosure
PA
Planting Area
EQ.
Equal
PH
Panic hardware
EQPT.
`Equipment
PLA5.
Plaster
E.W.
Each Way
PLYWD.
Plywood
EXh.
Exhaust
PNL
Panel
EXP.
Ex ansion
PR.
Pair
EXT.
Exterior
PT.
Point
P.LAM.
Plastic Laminate
F.A.
Fire Alarm
F.D.
Floor Drain
Q.T,
Quarry Tile
FON.
Foundation
F.E.
Fire
P
Riser
Extinguisher
P.D.
Poof Drain
FEC
Fire
REF.
Reference
Extinguisher
REPR.
Refrigerator
Cabinet
REG.
Register
F.F.
Finish Floor
PEINF.
Reinforced
F.G.
Fmish Grade
REQ.
Required
F.H.
Flat head
RE51L.
Resilient
FHC
Fire Hose Cab. R.H
Round Head
FIN.
Fimsh
RM.
Room
FLASK.
Flashing
R.O.
Rough Opening
FLR.
Floor
PWD.
Redwood
FLUOR.
Fluorescent
F.O.C.
Face of Conc. 5.
South
F.O.F.
Face of Fmish
S.C.
Solid Core
F.O.M.
Face of
SCHED.
Schedule
Masonry
DRAWING 5YMB0L LEGEND
N PROJECT NORTH
2 g COLUMN REFERENCE GRIDS
8,23 = COLUMN DESIGNATION
B -
I
SAA
ELEVATION
4 =ELEVATION DESIGNATION
A5.1
A5.1 =REFERENCE DRAWING NUMBER
ARROW INDICATES DIRECTION OF VIEW
BUILDING SECTION
PROJECT DATA
C = SECTION DESIGNATION
0 --
A5.2 = REFERENCE DRAWING NUMBER
A5.2
ARROW INDICATES DIRECTION OF VIEW
6,750 SQFr
WALL SECTION
3. ZONING DESIGNATION:
E = SECTION DESIGNATION
A5.3
A5.3 = REFERENCE DRAWING NUMBER
INDUSTRIAL
ARROW INDICATES DIRECTION OF VIEW
DETAIL
10
10 = DETAIL DESIGNATION
8.3
8.3 = REFERENCE DRAWING NUMBER
APPLICABLE CODES
201 G BUILDING STANDARDS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE PART ,TITLE
24 C.C.R.
201 G CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE (CBC) PARTi2, TITLE 24 C.C.R.
(2015 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE (IBC) W CALIFORNIA
AMENDMENTS.
201 G CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE (CPC)
201 G'CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE (GMC)
201.6 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE (CEC)
201 G CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE (CFC)
201 G CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING CODE
201 G CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE
CUPERTINO MUNICIPAL CODE
SCOPE Of WORK
THE PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING:
1, NEW FENCE WITH ROLLING GATE.
2. NEW PARKING LOT STRIPING PIP R(
LOBBY CODE ANALYSIS
E1 6 LOBBY = ROOM NAME
900 E I =OCCUPANCY GROUP
45 G = SPACE USE - REF SPACE USE SCHEDULE
900 = FLOOR AREA - SQUARE FEET
45 = OCCUPANT LOAD ( CBC TABLE I O -A )
= OCCUPANT LOAD SIGN REQUIRED
WHEN NOTED - ( CBC SEC 1002.3 )
REF SIGNAGE SCHEDULE 111 i
1`1`1 001_ LEVEL LINE, CONTROL POINT
FFE 0'-0" = ELEVATION
MATCH LINE AND AREA
DESIGNATOR
SHADED PORTION 15 THE SIDE CONSIDERED
- CENTER LINES, FLOOR LINES
AND LEVEL LINES
--- SECTION LINES
----- PROPERTY LINES, BOUNDRY
LINES AND, MATCH LINES
— — — — HIDDEN CONSTRUCTION
FEATU RE
BREAKS Of BUILDING
COMPONENTS
Q3 �REVISION
3 =REVISION NUMBER
O GLAZED OPENING OR
WINDOW TYPE
5o) DOOR IDENTIFICATION
50 = DOOR NUMBER
VICINITY MAP
DRAWING INDEX
ARCHITECTURAL
PROJECT INFO, DRAWING INDEX, 4 RENDERING
SITE PIAN
N
PROJECT SITE
D
0
PROJECT TEAM
PROJECT DATA
I. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.:
357-19-054
OWNER ARCHITECT
REBEL SUN ADAPTIVE ARCHITECTURE
2.. LOT SIZE:
6,750 SQFr
CONTACT: CISCO RIVERA CONTACT: JANICE YEH
10800 IMPERIAL AVE 201 1 1 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
3. ZONING DESIGNATION:
P(MQ
CUPERTINO, CA 95014 SUITE 270
4. LAND USE DESIGNATION:
INDUSTRIAL
(G50) 57G-3671 CUPERTINO, CA 95014
(408) 8G5-1089
5. EXISTING BLDG. DESCRIPTION:
EXISTING I STORY,
D
2,680 5F BUILDING
MA..®=�
jC7:
G. AREA OF WORK:
TYPE OF OCCUPANCY:
PARKING LOT, APPROX. 3,275 SF
5-1 OCCUPANCY
DIS 'm r
Slignak e
CCss�bi�{!G.
FRONT RENDERING
..........
vG��gSD ATo'u,, ;
Janice T. Yeh
- C-3 3 <;
Iri<1p\Ida �` •..••.
ADAPTIVE
ARCHITECTURE
20111 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
SUITE 270
CUPERTINO, CA 95014
(408) 865-1089
0
0
10 7110/18 PLANNING RESUBMITTAL
0 5114118 PLANNING SUBMITTAL
Q q1ATE
PRELIM PLANNING REVIEW
NO DESCRIPTION
REVISIONS
DRAWN: JY CHECKED:
DATE: SCALE:A5 NOTED
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT INFO,
DRAWING INDEX,
& RENDERING
DRAWING A®o I
NUMBER:
D
0
�(D
w�
�Z
>LO
Z
<�<
D
�U
sc
0-
Wd
®
W
W
Z
2 W
oU
W
U—
Z
..........
vG��gSD ATo'u,, ;
Janice T. Yeh
- C-3 3 <;
Iri<1p\Ida �` •..••.
ADAPTIVE
ARCHITECTURE
20111 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
SUITE 270
CUPERTINO, CA 95014
(408) 865-1089
0
0
10 7110/18 PLANNING RESUBMITTAL
0 5114118 PLANNING SUBMITTAL
Q q1ATE
PRELIM PLANNING REVIEW
NO DESCRIPTION
REVISIONS
DRAWN: JY CHECKED:
DATE: SCALE:A5 NOTED
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT INFO,
DRAWING INDEX,
& RENDERING
DRAWING A®o I
NUMBER:
w�
Z D
wLo
D
IL- Imo-- O
Z
® W _
�n Fw
O a
00
� ( U
r
Zp g �
IppLJ�pLJI
LL
W
Z
_i§�gED
J Fes.
5'* Janice T. Yeh
9 C-33243 3
?RFs 01131119
h„TgpF OF.
Iryfhtw���c.� ......
ADAPTIVE
ARCHITECTURE
20111 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
SUITE 270
CUPERTINO, CA 95014
(408) 865-1089
0
0 7110118 PLANNING RESUBMITTAL
05114/18 PLANNING SUBMITTAL
A1419118 I I PRELIM PLANNING REVIEW
NO DATE BY DESCRIPTION
REVISIONS
DRAWN:JY CHECKED:
DATE: SCALE:AS NOTED
PROJECT NUMBER:
SITE PLAN,
SITE DETAILS,
& FENCE ELEV.
DRAWING
NUMBER: Uo
i
4
METAL ADDRESS NUMBEI15
FENCE MOUNTED
ACCESSIBLE PARKING CONCRETE
SIGN, SEE WHEELSTOP,
EQ.V EQ. EQ. 20'-0" MANUAL ROLLING GATE OPENING
(E) CHAIN LINK
CMU WALL
O REMAIN
TYP
FENCE TO REMAIN
�(E)
4" WIDE STRIPES,
-9,
0 o BLUE @ BORDERS,
0„ WHITE @
- DIAGONALS, TYP.
0
O
I 2
.KIN
ACCP55113ILITY ti 6- ❑
SYMBOL
m
50'-0" PROPERTY WIDTH
4' MIN
PAINTED WHITE
LETTERS, 12" HIGH
SEALED REDWOOD, TYP. KNOX BOX SHALL BE INSTALLED CONFORMING TO FIRE MODIFY
HEIGHT OF (E)
DEPARTMENT STANDARD DETAIL AND SPECIFICATION K-1 . CMU
WALL. SEE SITE
CALL (408) 378-4010 FOR MORE INFORMATION. AT TIME OF PLAN FOR EXTENT.
FINAL INSPECTION, ACCESS KEYS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE
FIRE DEPARTMENT.
NEW FENCE ELEVATION
3/8" =1'
ACCESSIBLE PARKING PLAN
1/4" = 1'
A P.haphlolepi5 indica/ India hawthorne
B Linope muscarJ Aztec grass
AUTO REPAIR SHOP A )fes I(-TI'�` A L
p @
Application Nhirilbe
� 3
C Phormlum ten" Sweet mist
D l YC
(,!1
P ��,_
�'-D"
0.080" THK AL SIGN PAINTED
PLANTING SCHEDULE
Sig at
Signature
3
pp
Case IN-lanager
W/BLUE REFLECTORIZED PAINT
FEB BLUE 15090 PER STND .5958
INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF
�� ACCESSIBILITY AND GRAPHICS
PAINTED W/ WHITE REFLECTORIZED
P C PAINT - GRAPHICS AS FOLLOWS:
ACCESSIBLE PARKING - MINIMUM
EDGE OF STREET
0'-0"
5ET5ACK
_ -
(E) CHAIN LINK FENCE
TO REMAIN
m e 135.00'
0
IPARKNIN,
FINE VW FINE 8250 "
J�3 _ q //
TYP VANDAL PRO6F "SCREWSSELF APPING
W
I �I
I I
o REBEL SUN, LLC
p o o
0 0 "' I I
EXISTING I STORY BUILDING
z
N
W
(N) WOOD # METAL
I
I I
REST
G5 5F
ACCESSIBLE PARKING
Q
J
Q
ROLLING FENCE
FENCE W/
GATE
of
6
.
8'-6" TYP. I ❑ OFFICE
8'- ' 325 SF
(E) WALL MOOED
o LIGHT FIXTURE TO REMAIN— — — 7
WAREHOUSE
1,530 SF
STORAGEO
250 5F
o
DETAIL
OFF-STREET PARKING ANALYSIS
USE
AREA
(5Q. FT.)
PARKING NO. OF STALLS
RATIO NEEDED
g
o N (E)POLL-UP DOOR . TRUCK LOADING AREA
W
LL
9 0
-
(N) LANDSCAPE
PLANTER C
I
(E) GAS ELECTRICAL 510 5F
METERS @ CORNER
(N) CONCRETE FILLED
STEEL BOLLARDS ��
0" f
OFFICE
325
1/255
2
WAREHOUSE / STORAGE/
LOADING /RESTROOM
2,355
/450
6
PARKING STALLS NEEDED
8
To 'o (E) GATE
B C
10'-0"
135.00'
5'-0" 22'-0" 22'-0"
TOTAL PARKING STALLS PROVIDED
8
(E) POWER POLE
ACCE551BLE PARKING ANALYSIS
(E) CMU WALL, MODIFY HEIGHT
TO BE 3'-0" HIGH MAX. BTW.
REQUIRED
PROVIDED
NORTH
PROPERTY LINE * FENCE
(E) CMU WALL TO REMAIN
PRIVATE RESIDENCE
i.
PRIVATE RESIDENCE
GARAGE
VAN ACCESSIBLE
I
I
�I
l}
(PER CBC TABLE 118-208.2)
II
j
SITE PLAN
1i8"=1'
PARKING ANALYSIS
w�
Z D
wLo
D
IL- Imo-- O
Z
® W _
�n Fw
O a
00
� ( U
r
Zp g �
IppLJ�pLJI
LL
W
Z
_i§�gED
J Fes.
5'* Janice T. Yeh
9 C-33243 3
?RFs 01131119
h„TgpF OF.
Iryfhtw���c.� ......
ADAPTIVE
ARCHITECTURE
20111 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
SUITE 270
CUPERTINO, CA 95014
(408) 865-1089
0
0 7110118 PLANNING RESUBMITTAL
05114/18 PLANNING SUBMITTAL
A1419118 I I PRELIM PLANNING REVIEW
NO DATE BY DESCRIPTION
REVISIONS
DRAWN:JY CHECKED:
DATE: SCALE:AS NOTED
PROJECT NUMBER:
SITE PLAN,
SITE DETAILS,
& FENCE ELEV.
DRAWING
NUMBER: Uo
FN D 3/4" I P-
MARKED AS PT. IN THE F1EL
FN D 3/4!' IP
t
MARKED AS PT. 1 IN THE FEEL
DRQFIE"LD SURVEY EXHIBIT
r
i
10-280IMPERIAL
CUPERTIN � CALIFORNIA
SCALE 17 =2:01 MARCH 3, 2018